by Jason Tieri | Jan 25, 2026 | Blog
Download the Audio Podcast
The gig economy promises convenience, speed, and flexible work, but this week’s stories reveal the cost when incentives, safety, and ethics collide. We start with a chilling follow-up: an 83-year-old Ohio man convicted of murdering an Uber Eats driver after both he and the driver were targeted by scammers. The dash cam evidence left little doubt, but the broader lesson runs deeper. Scam operations increasingly exploit delivery flows, convincing customers and drivers to act on fear. Drivers arrive at unfamiliar homes, while residents—already panicked—assume the worst. The result: tragedy that neither platform policies nor current safety tooling prevented. Education on scams matters, but so do structural safeguards: clearer package policies, courier verification cues for customers, and rapid escalation paths that flag scam patterns before they become deadly.
Safety failures weren’t limited to scams. A federal bellwether trial alleges widespread sexual assault by rideshare drivers and a corporate culture that downplayed reports. Internal messages—about “killing stories” and routing victim info to outside adjusters—erode trust. The legal strategy claims incidents were consensual or isolated; the human reality is that underreporting, thin background checks, and weak enforcement create a predictable risk environment. Real fixes will demand trade-offs: recurring, federated background checks (ideally fingerprint-based and portable across apps), faster deactivation thresholds when multiple credible complaints arise, and standardized in-car camera policies with privacy guardrails. None of these are cheap, but ignoring them is costlier—for victims, drivers, and the long-term legitimacy of rideshare itself.
Even the lighter stories pointed to design gaps and misaligned incentives. A viral clip showed a shopper casually dumping groceries at a doorstep, sparking the eternal tipping debate. But the core issue is quality control: ratings without accountability produce performative compliance, not care. Platforms tout training badges; what works better is item-level photo proof, pattern detection for mishandling, and tighter removal policies for repeat offenders. On the tech frontier, we watched a delivery robot get obliterated by a train and a Waymo stuck at a gate it wouldn’t approach. Autonomy excels on predictable roads; it falters at edge cases like sensors misreading gate proximity or geofencing around tracks. These shortcomings aren’t fatal to the tech, but they demand more robust policy and environment mapping—especially in dense residential complexes.
Amid all this, Uber announced a major expansion with Kroger and affiliated banners, plus renewed talk of drones. Partnerships promise reach; reliability requires disciplined logistics. Shoppers and drivers feel the friction when orders sprawl across categories like sushi, floral, and groceries with tight windows. Drone promises still lag real deployment; until then, stable pay, accurate ETAs, and clear substitution policies move the needle more than splashy pilots. Finally, we tackled “hood Uber” cash rides—cheaper for riders and riskier for everyone. No insurance, no identity trail, no platform protections. It’s a symptom of weak transit options and high app pricing, but the fix isn’t riskier rides; it’s lower-cost tiers supported by verified identity, or community transit solutions that actually meet late-shift demand.
The gig economy thrives on trust: the trust that a courier is who they say they are, that a rider gets home safely, that groceries arrive intact, that a robot won’t stall at a gate or die on the tracks. Trust isn’t a slogan; it’s a system. Stronger verification, portable background checks, clear removal thresholds, smarter autonomy logic, and true customer-driver support will rebuild it. Until then, drivers should run dual dash cams and avoid non-platform cash rides; customers should verify couriers and avoid engaging with unsealed home-made items; and platforms should prioritize safety signals over PR wins. Convenience brought us here; credibility will decide what survives.
by Jason Tieri | Jan 18, 2026 | Blog
Download the audio podcast!
January in the gig economy hits like a cold front. Demand fades, shoppers hoard routes, and drivers stare at blank screens wondering if the warehouse moved or the app died. We talk about dry January and why it means dry wallets, then get tactical. If you rely on gig income, the only safe move is a multi‑app portfolio: rideshare, food delivery, parcels, and shopping, plus reserve systems where they work. Rates dip and offers vanish, so flexibility becomes strategy. Accepting less for Amazon routes or switching to Instacart for a weekend grocery surge can keep cash flowing. The real lesson is to plan for seasonal troughs, stack savings when December pops, and refuse to depend on one platform.
Misinformation became its own gig. A viral “DoorDash whistleblower” turned out to be AI, and it still lured press, executives, and half the internet. That’s the new landscape: text that looks real and spreads faster than corrections. We discuss how to spot digital tells, why slush‑fund claims smelled off, and why companies must verify before reacting. Then we zoom out to AI’s infrastructure: data centers eating power and pushing local utility rates up. Towns take huge buyouts, neighbors get sticker shock, and Microsoft promises to absorb increases around new facilities. It’s not abstract for drivers; higher electricity hits EV charging, home bills, and warehouse costs that ripple into payouts.
Policy keeps sprinting to catch up. California’s new rule mandating full refunds for wrong or missing orders sounds great until you picture repeat abusers. We like the promise of live human support and fast refunds, but there must be guardrails: limits on serial claims, proof thresholds, and shielding restaurants from fraudulent chargebacks. When customers lie, they don’t hit a faceless app; they punch the cook, the courier, and the margins. The Brooklyn‑style broccoli saga drives home another point: training matters. If a Spark shopper confuses crowns with florets and weighs a nugget at five cents, that’s not just a joke; it’s a systems issue where quality checks and clearer UI could prevent waste and refunds.
Trust and data collide in less obvious ways. Amazon Flex couriers are nudged to install a third‑party safe‑driving app to earn gift cards. We question the bargain: small perks traded for driving telemetry that can mark you as a hard braker in someone’s algorithm. Even if Amazon says it won’t receive the data, aggregators monetize somehow. A driver’s risk profile can outlive a $25 code, and gig workers have learned the hard way that “not affiliated” can evolve. Meanwhile, Uber is building kiosks at airports for travelers without data plans. It’s smart access design: order at a screen, pay, and get a printed receipt with car details. It also reveals an untapped market that still hasn’t tried rideshare, and that means more trips for drivers when systems don’t fail.
Autonomy keeps making headlines, sometimes for the wrong reasons. A Waymo halted on train tracks captured the uncanny valley of safety: machines that promise superhuman perception still make human‑seeming mistakes. Contrast that with Zooks in Las Vegas: no steering wheel, bi‑directional motion, roomy cabins, and permissive rules for food and drink. Seven years of mapping before public launch shows a different posture—slow, careful, and local. On the delivery side, China’s autonomous vans bulldozing through construction and snow shows what happens when speed outruns safety. Packages survive less than sidewalks. If this becomes the norm, regulators and insurers will rewrite the rules before drivers see benefits.
Finally, we unpack New York City’s allegation that Uber Eats and DoorDash redesigned tipping flows to suppress pre‑checkout tips, slicing average tips from $2.17 to $0.76. If accurate, that’s a massive pay cut masked as “UI changes.” Tips shouldn’t be the foundation of pay, but they are. Moving tipping to post‑delivery shifts psychology: fewer taps, more friction, lower earnings. Workers need transparency on payout timing, tip presentation, and minimums that don’t get clawed back by design. There’s a brighter note: Walmart and Wing are scaling drone delivery to reach tens of millions. For suburban logistics, drones could take the low‑weight, high‑frequency runs and free drivers for higher‑value routes. Noise and airspace will be challenges, but the mix of drones, vans, and human couriers might finally balance speed with earnings. Until then, resilience means diversifying, saving through the peaks, and pushing apps—and lawmakers—for fair design.
by Jason Tieri | Jan 11, 2026 | Blog
Download the show here!
The conversation opens with a ground-level reality check: incentives move behavior, and when they disappear, so does supply. An Uber ride quest paying an extra eight dollars per trip pulled a driver through a slow holiday market, yet similar carrots on Lyft have gone missing for months. Meanwhile, Walmart’s Spark incentives show up almost daily except on New Year’s Eve, when workloads spiked and bonuses mysteriously vanished. That inconsistency leaves drivers weighing dead miles, long returns from small towns, and whether a $30 fare plus a small quest kicker truly beats a day of stacked shop-and-deliver orders. The theme is simple but powerful: on-demand labor follows incentives, and when platforms misalign them, workers don’t show up.
The show’s centerpiece is the DoorDash “desperation score” rumor: a Reddit-claimed internal metric using driver behavior to tune pay. Verified or not, it hits a nerve because algorithmic steering already shapes who sees which orders and at what price. The hosts split the hair between efficiency and exploitation—if a platform routes low-paying offers to drivers who accept anything, is that good operations or a moral breach? The line is blurry. Add in Instacart’s reported price testing and faint political thunder for regulating algorithmic pay, and you get a looming policy question: when does optimization become manipulation? The takeaway lands somewhere pragmatic—capitalism is fine, secrecy is fine, but not if it buries harm to workers.
Operational absurdities keep surfacing. A McDonald’s weighing orders to curb “theft” sounds like rigor until you recognize most missing items are simple errors under time pressure. Still, standard weights for bags could create accountability where audits keep failing. Then there’s consumer behavior: “wrapped” summaries from Uber and others risk backfiring by forcing people to face how often they order delivery. Seeing 130 orders a year, or weekly coffee at full price, jolts habits. Platforms want stickiness, but transparency can drive self-correction, especially as fees and tips push average tickets into the $30–$40 range.
Hardware and partnerships are shifting too. Octopus pivoting to Uber Journey TV points-only for Uber trips drains value for Lyft-heavy drivers and trims the mini-economy of in-car games that once encouraged engagement. It’s a reminder that platform exclusivity rarely benefits workers. On the vehicle side, trucks are quietly becoming Swiss Army knives of gig work: hauling furniture, towing, and oversized deliveries. With many owners logging 10+ hours a week, real margins come down to fuel math and smart routing, particularly as EV bets wobble and battery plants retool toward data-center demand instead of cars.
Automation feels both promising and fragile. A Waymo stopping at a red and then rolling into an illegal right turn underlines how brittle edge-case logic can be. Worse is the stowaway caught in a trunk—proof that autonomy needs physical security checks, door-state verification, and better live monitoring. Trust requires more than clean disengagement charts; it needs safety protocols for the messy human world. That same human mess shows up in petty fraud too, like a delivery driver dragging a bag away by string after snapping a photo. It’s almost comic, until you remember every scam erodes consumer patience and driver credibility.
Finally, discovery itself is becoming an AI product. DoorDash’s Zesty app aims to recommend real places with social proof and chat prompts tuned to mood and context. If it resists pay-to-rank pressure, it could beat the noise of generic review sites by learning taste, not just stars. That’s a useful idea in a market where convenience won, costs spiked, and trust got complicated. The through-line across all these stories is alignment: incentives that match effort, transparency that informs without shaming, automation that’s secure, and discovery that respects taste over ad spend. When those align, gig work can be both profitable and humane.
by Jason Tieri | Dec 29, 2025 | Blog
Download the show here!
The year’s end brings more than holiday traffic for gig workers; it is exposing where the system bends and breaks. The conversation opens with the surge of Waymo vehicles and a sobering look at autonomy’s readiness for real streets. Recalls over school bus behavior, gridlock during power outages, and odd passing maneuvers reveal a gap between glossy PR and practical safety. If an autonomous car cannot treat a dark intersection like a four-way stop, confidence collapses. That’s not just a tech story; it spills into public trust, regulatory scrutiny, and insurance realities. The panel argues that self-insured fleets, guarded data, and courtroom wins over disclosure don’t substitute for robust performance in messy cities where liability is human, not hypothetical.
From there, the topic shifts to an overlooked lever: data. Every rejected $2 order pushed to fifteen drivers costs real money in compute, routing, and marketplace churn. With “Dash Now for all” rolling out, oversaturation may spike, and the cost to process bad orders could rise as markets flood with new on-demand drivers. The proposed remedy is controversial but clear: cap concurrent drivers dynamically. If a city needs 700 active drivers at peak, allow 1,000, not 1,800. Real-time entry would free a spot when someone swaps to another app. Fewer idle vehicles means cleaner data, lower routing overhead, and space to improve base pay. It also cools neighborhood congestion and wins points with city councils sensitive to traffic, emissions, and curb chaos.
Skeptics ask if platforms would pass savings to drivers. The answer may be political as much as economic. 2026 looks like a litigation year, with multi-state actions and FTC scrutiny pushing platforms to show good faith. A cap reduces noise in the marketplace, lowers failed dispatch loops, and signals responsibility to regulators. Meanwhile, waitlists can prevent false hope for new entrants who are unlikely to earn in saturated zones. For part-timers, smarter access—rather than unlimited access—could mean better odds when they actually log on. Hard choices beat a slow drift where nobody wins: customers pay more, restaurants give up margin, drivers chase scraps, and platforms burn trust.
Then comes a real-world pivot: a Boulder restaurant group pulled menus from the big apps and routed ordering through their own sites, while still using DoorDash drivers for fulfillment without handing DoorDash the fees or payment flow. It’s direct ordering with third-party delivery, clear menu pricing, a simple delivery fee paid to drivers, and tipping transparency. Is it scalable? Maybe not everywhere. But in markets where brand loyalty and local culture are strong, it can reset expectations: no mystery markups, better driver pay per trip, and restaurants keeping their margins. If replicated in similar college towns like Ann Arbor, a pattern could form: premium independents reclaim ordering while tapping a flexible driver network for last mile.
Alongside these structural shifts, the path to earnings is evolving. Multi-apping, private ride clients, catering blocks, and B2B deliveries build resilience as single-app dependence fades. The panel is blunt: many drivers who once thrived full-time are working fewer nights or pivoting to higher-value niches. Education matters—understanding your market, hours, and mix. The learning curve is steeper than it looks from social media highlights. Discipline, customer nuance, and vehicle cost control separate sustainable income from burnout. A smarter, leaner network with fewer idle drivers, clearer pricing, and direct-order channels could stabilize an ecosystem that has run hot for too long.
Ultimately, the takeaway is pragmatic. Autonomous vehicles won’t rescue delivery economics soon; the tech still stumbles on basics. The marketplace needs intentional design: fewer wasted pings, better base pay, and credible transparency that restores trust among cities, restaurants, and drivers. Dynamic caps, waitlists, and direct ordering are not silver bullets, but they are tools with leverage. As lawsuits and policy pressure mount, platforms can either let courts force their hand or choose reforms that actually make service better. The gig economy thrives when the flywheel spins cleanly—orders priced fairly, drivers paid reliably, and cities freed from perpetual congestion. That future is possible, but only if we stop pretending the current noise is normal.
by Jason Tieri | Dec 22, 2025 | Blog
Download the show here!
The gig economy thrives on flexibility, speed, and trust. That trust was tested by a viral delivery clip showing a DoorDash driver spraying a customer’s bag, then blaming a spider. Beyond the shock, the moment exposes two realities: first, the public’s reliance on cameras as truth-tellers; second, how fragile customer confidence becomes when a few bad actors poison the well. We discuss why platforms should respond with decisive bans, shared safety signals across apps, and clearer escalation paths for customers and workers. Punishing deliberate harm protects everyone and raises the bar for professional standards without crushing genuine, hardworking drivers.
That story flows into a larger discussion on safety. Delivery and rideshare can be isolating and dangerous, with incidents ranging from carjackings to abductions. Features like in-app location sharing and check-ins help, but they often act too late. Real safety lives in proactive habits: controlled approach to doors, avoiding blind entryways, keeping distance at thresholds, scanning for cameras and lights, and trusting gut signals. For women working nights and anyone delivering to unfamiliar areas, small rules—like sending a quick ETA to a trusted contact, sticking to well-lit drop spots, and avoiding enclosed porches—stack up to real protection. On platform side, faster “SOS” routing, tighter verification, and cross-app bans for violent behavior would deter predators who hop between services after suspensions.
From safety to pricing, we unpack Consumer Reports’ findings on Instacart’s AI-enabled pricing, where the same items can cost different amounts for different users. That’s dynamic pricing migrating from rideshare to groceries. It’s not just surge; it’s behavioral pricing based on patterns, location, and willingness to pay. The result is confusion, distrust, and a sense that the ground is moving under customers’ feet. Transparency is the cure: standardized price bands, receipts showing store price vs. service premium, and clear explanations of fees. If the algorithms know you, you deserve to know the rules. It’s better business, too—few things erode loyalty faster than guessing games at checkout.
We also examine how AI assistants might overwhelm siloed apps. Imagine telling a smart browser to “find the lowest total cost, fastest delivery for this list,” and it comparison-shops stores, fees, and couriers in seconds. That could de-rank overpriced platforms and elevate nimble local options with fair pricing and solid reviews. For workers, it could redirect demand to the places that pay consistently and don’t play shell games with tips. But there’s a catch: AI tends to “agree” with the prompt. You need to ask the right questions—total cost vs. base price, speed vs. reliability, and safety of pickup points—so the results serve your real goals, not just the cheapest line item.
Policy fights in New York add fuel to the tipping debate. If tips move post-delivery and become less prominent, earnings fall toward the guaranteed floor, not the historic averages. Pre-checkout tip prompts with clear defaults keep the social norm intact and stabilize pay. Over time, the platforms will chase clarity and trust because those win customer and worker retention. The bolder proposal we explore is city-level limits on active drivers to reduce oversaturation, lift offer quality, and reduce data costs—potentially allowing higher per-order pay. It’s controversial, but a pilot could reveal whether scarcity leads to healthier pay without crushing access.
Finally, the human piece. Gig work can feel lonely. Community spaces—Telegram groups, live streams, and Patreons—give people a place to swap routes, vent about bad nights, and crowdsource fixes. That support turns a solitary grind into a shared craft. Whether you’re navigating late-night drop-offs, rejecting bad substitutions, or testing new AI tools, a trusted circle makes you smarter and safer. Pair that with realistic expectations about earnings, strict personal safety rules, and a healthy skepticism of algorithmic fog, and you’ll build a durable gig playbook for 2025.
by Jason Tieri | Dec 15, 2025 | Blog
Download the audio podcast!
The latest wave of gig economy news shows how fast the space shifts between convenience, risk, and opportunity. We start with Uber’s expanding ad business, which now uses privacy‑screened trip insights to target promotions based on where riders go and what they do. On paper, the value proposition is clear: timely coupons tied to places you already visit and campaigns that reflect local patterns. In practice, riders worry about how much location data is inferred, while drivers wonder who benefits from ads that monetize their work with no revenue share. When ad revenue approaches billions, trust hinges on transparent policies, opt‑outs that are easy to find, and clear lines between anonymous trend data and personal behavior. Riders want relevance without surveillance; drivers want fair compensation when platforms profit off their routes.
Security concerns don’t end with ads. DoorDash account takeovers are draining restaurant payouts when attackers reset credentials and swap bank details. This isn’t a breach of DoorDash systems per se; it’s basic credential theft that exploits reused passwords and weak email security. The fix starts with non‑negotiables: unique passwords stored in a manager, mandatory two‑factor authentication on every merchant and driver account, and account‑change alerts that require out‑of‑band verification before bank info is updated. Restaurants also need daily payout reconciliations and a named owner for platform security so problems are spotted within hours, not weeks. Platforms can help by making 2FA default, requiring identity rechecks for banking changes, and proactively flagging unusual payout patterns.
At the curb, theft is getting smarter. Porch pirates are now using Wi‑Fi jammers to knock out cameras, leaving homeowners with corrupted clips and missing packages. The practical defense is layered. Hardwired cameras and local recording resist jammers better than Wi‑Fi‑only devices. Mixed networks, cameras on different bands, and backup cellular recording add resilience. For deliveries, secure options like Amazon lockers, controlled access delivery, or smart garage drop‑off cut risk by removing the package from view. Even simple tactics—setting a predictable delivery window when someone is home or using a low‑cost lockbox—shrink the attack surface. The goal isn’t perfect security; it’s stacking enough friction that your house isn’t the easy target on the block.
Autonomy brings its own surprises. A Waymo roadside tech shared how often he’s called out to close a door, unjam a seatbelt, or tidy a cabin so the car can depart. It’s a reminder that “driverless” still needs people. The real question is service quality at scale: who cleans the cars, how quickly do issues get resolved, and will platforms enforce cleaning fees so passengers don’t treat robotaxis like trash cans? Without consistent standards and accountability, the rider experience will suffer long before autonomy replaces human drivers. And in the meantime, drivers can still find value in the ecosystem—from side income like in‑car ads or even license plate scanning hardware for repo networks in dense cities—if the numbers pencil out and local laws allow it.
Culture and perception also matter. A viral clip mocked men over 30 working full‑time on Uber Eats, calling it “not a real job.” That attitude ignores economic reality and the upside of flexible work. The smarter frame is sustainability: earnings after expenses, safety, and a path to stability. Many drivers build hybrid portfolios—rideshare on busy weekends, food delivery on icy nights, retail parcel routes during holidays. Choice is the strength of the gig economy. Rather than shaming, the conversation should center on pay transparency, fair deactivation policies, and tools that help workers optimize routes, avoid risk, and upskill into better‑paid tasks. Flexibility without dignity isn’t a win; neither is stability that can’t pay the bills.
Finally, we’re watching AI creep from curiosity to utility. Instacart’s integration with ChatGPT promises to turn meal ideas into shoppable carts without app‑switching. If it’s seamless, it will normalize conversational commerce: “Plan a 30‑minute high‑protein dinner for four, under $25, and order it.” The risk is adding steps or creating a privacy tax. Done right, AI will compress decision‑making and reduce friction for shoppers and gig workers alike, surfacing clear substitutions, store‑level availability, and realistic ETAs. Done poorly, it’s one more interface between you and your groceries. The throughline across all these stories is simple: the best tech feels invisible, the best policies protect people by default, and the best platforms share value when they monetize our time and data.
